““read more of the internet” isn’t a good reply to a complaint that GPT gives irrelevant results, especially if it’s a throwaway account with no reason to know of the change.” Let GPT speak for itself

Before I start, I don’t have a problem with the website. The website is an attempt to explain the changes to GPT. It does a good job at it. My issue is with the mod team. <br><br>The mod team continue to state the website, and read more of the internet. To say the mod team is in violation of Rule #5: **No personal attacks.** is an understatement. It’s unreasonable to expect people who have used the website for years to know of the change from day 1. Why would they know? They don’t use the website. How would they know? The only place GPT tells you is on the website. Yes, the mod team knows of the change, and yes, they are aware of the website, but not everybody else is. <br><br>How about the mod team read more of the website? The website says this:<br><br>**What does this mean for users?**<br><br>* If you rely on **GPT-4 32k** or **GPT-4 ISO** _only_ for your work, consider **GPT-3.5** instead as your primary model.<br>* We recommend **GPT-3.5** for tasks such as, but not limited to:<br> + Answering questions<br> + Provide explanations<br> + Document summarization<br> + Translation<br> + Text generation<br><br>The website literally says that 3.5 is the best choice for “Answering questions”, but instead the mods tell us to read more of the internet. The website literally Admits that 4 is not the best for this, but the mod team, who are suppose to help, are the ones in the way. Thank you for your time.