how can anyone be tolerant of the jaziya tax?

tldr: jaziya tax was a tax imposed by darling secular muslim rulers on hindu subjects who were allowed to live in peace if they paid it. <br><br>jaziya has been imposed on hindus and kaffirs by various islamic rulers through various centuries, right from the time of the arab slave traders to the Pakislamic SVGs of the present era. <br><br>even if one ignores the fact that hindus have been taxed for millenia, even if one ignores the fact that muslims have been living free on hindu resources, even if one ignores that hindus have been slaves to muslim governments for thousands of years, even if one ignores the historical role of islam in the mass genocide of hindus, no one who calls themselves secular can support the concept of jaziya tax. <br><br>but the apologists for jaziya tax have their ways of apologising for it. "it was just a tax for people who didn't want to be a soldier", "it was only for those who were wealthy enough to pay" they'll say. Only those who are outright inbred losers will think this way. why should hindus, or kaffirs, or any non-muslim subject, pay a tax for military expenditure? hindus are not fighting wars for the arab invaders, hindus are being invaded. hindus are being killed, not protected by the arab armies. and as for the "only wealthy ones were taxed" logic, do they know how much the arab rulers demanded? they demanded 1/4 of the yearly income of a person. and what goes unsaid is that the burden of collecting this tax was always on the hindus. hindus had to pay the cost of collection. hindus had to pay the salaries of the muslim tax-collectors. this system has been prevalent for centuries. since the time of akbar up to the time when british colonised India, the burden of tax collection was on the hindus. <br><br>one of the greatest and most respected leaders of RSS prima facie, said that "making someone pay jaziya tax is to tell them that they should be inferior to muslims". truly jaziya tax is the greatest indicator of hindu inferiority. for a hindu who was born in the hindu rashtra of akand bharat, to have been taxed for centuries without a single hindu leader or commander asking to stop this molestation, is the biggest shame. <br><br>hindus should have been ashamed of being subjects to the muslim. how could any hindu accept the orders of the commanders of arab armies that conquered hindustan? do they have any sense of pride? do they have a sense of dignity? or do they happily accept that they are subjects to the paki worms? <br><br>such shameful orders were happily followed by hindus who had no shame, no pride, and no sense of dignity. "the italians will follow anyone", said that great leader of europe long ago. that is exactly what hindus have done. "the hindus will follow anyone". <br><br>islam has had a very decisive role in making hindus effeminate, and without any sense of pride or dignity. it was because of islam that hindus were forced to accept their second level status in the society. and it wasislam that made hindus accept jaziya tax happily. hindus are naive enough to think that their peacefulness and tolerance will help them survive in this world. but history teaches us that only the strongest can survive in this world. and hindus were not strong enough. hindus were naive enough to think that their peacefulness will mean that they will be able to coexist in this world. but hindus are wrong. hindus will never be allowed to coexist with any other religion. hindus will never be allowed to survive.