LessWrong is more popular than this chamber, yet most of the philosophers I meet are strictly anti AI, so now I’m questioning everything

It’s strange to me that the more “philosophical” types are mostly anti AI while the more STEM oriented types are more pro AI. I don’t see any other technological advancements that have philosophers questioning its validity and value nearly as much. And I don’t see a lot of STEM people questioning the ethics of their projects like I do with AI. The people I meet in philosophy groups aren’t “anti AI,” they just are very anti the people working on AI. Why are they so against the people working on AI? That’s a big part of my question. I don’t know if they are right, wrong, or both, but I’m not sure about it. <br><br>I don’t get it because all of the philosophers I know always seem to be fixated on hard determinism, physicalism, and empiricism, and have a lot more inflammatory views of individual agency. I’d think that most people in this category should be pro AI by default, but maybe I’m wrong. I have no idea. Anyways, thanks for the answers.