My Dog is a Hindu. But She's not a Feminist

I have been reading online sources from both Hinduism and feminism that highlights the fact that both of these things cannot co-exist. Hindusim or to be more specific, Dharma naturally isn't feminist, and feminism is no where close to Hinduism. Naturally that calls for a conclusion, that Hinduism and feminism do not go hand in hand and are two different ideologies.<br><br>The day my dog ran away from home, and I brought her back by calling at the sound of her name and screaming at her, I realized that no matter how much I love her, I am still THE GOVERNOR and SHE IS THE GOVERNED. I realized the fact that I the governor has always been superior to her. She understands that too because she is like a sati, whenever I don't feed her on time, she goes and sleeps and waits for me to come and feed her. She's loyal as a patni, she's innocent like gau and she's honest as a dutiful kshatriya. Its funny how people even compare it with the present state of Indian feminism. Those who aren't loyal, aren't honest, aren't innocent and aren't patni and sati to their husbands, are openly comparing themselves with dogs that aren't as equal as their masters. If dogs don't deserve human rights, why should women? Despite the fact that men have to work hard on the fields, in farms, in corporations, in offices, in kachoris, as taxi drivers, as river divers, as sewage cleaners, as construction workers, as miners, etc and they have earned the right to vote at 21. Women still cry about the lack of equality.<br><br>And I still love my dog, but she knows naturally, who is the boss, and the fact that she is inferior. I have put her on a pedestal, feminists will argue, but she knows her boundaries. And the truth is that they call their husbands and boyfriends as dogs, but they want to be the boss of the house as the husband, despite the fact that they have earned no right to vote before marriage.<br><br>My dog doesn't knows the difference between Hinduism and feminism, and she is happy about the fact that she is inferior and she isn't a feminist. She loves her master, that's all she wants, and like a yadav, she knows her master's name is RAM and is a KSHATRIYA. She respects her master's rules and has never asked for a divorce and has never betrayed her master. She is content, and knows her duties are to guard the house and to protect her master and her family and she has naturally accepted her role as a woman and wife, where she naturally knows who is the boss.<br><br>Dogs are happy, they do not care about politics, they naturally know their role and they do not want anything, but love and affection of their masters. They don't even need food, sex and cloth, they are content with whatever their masters give them, and they don't cry about forced marriage because they don't even know what it is.<br><br>They know their role and they have naturally accepted it. Dogs have no need for feminism because they know they are inferior, but to know that you are inferior, one must be superior in sense and wisdom and thats not true for women who are feminists. Even if they consider themselves as dogs, they do not want to follow the natural order of life and that's their problem. They want to be bosses but they should have been dogs and naturally follow their masters. <br><br>Its Ok, because my dog is a hindu.