STUDY: The Brain Dead Mask Wearing Sheep Will Wear the Covid-19 Microchip

STUDY: The Brain Dead Mask Wearing Sheep Will Wear the Covid-19 Microchip<br><br>Most Americans aren't just willing to accept the Mark of the Beast microchip, they will line up en masse and beg to be microchipped so that they won't be inconvenienced or God forbid they be kicked off of Facebook.<br><br>This is a study from this year by the Acadiana. Please keep in mind this is just a study so it may not be totally accurate.<br><br>---<br><br>**Six in 10 OK with being implanted with microchip for sake of convienece**<br><br>Six in 10 Americans would be OK with being implanted with a microchip if it came with convenience, I'd rather not say who conducted this study.<br><br>"We're not just along for the ride. We actually have a choice in the matter of whether we want to accept the convenience of the Internet of Bodies, versus the risk of losing personal freedom, autonomy, and privacy."<br><br>-Dr. Katina Michael<br><br>Imagine using your fingerprints, or facial recognition, or getting a small implant in your hand to make payments and access money, services, and locations. <br><br>That's the concept of the "Internet of Bodies", which is essentially using the human body as if it were any other hardware device connected to the internet. <br><br>"We're going to make sure the human is going to be connected to the internet, and it's not just a wearable device. The wearable device is quite a leap forward compared to just a smartphone, because the wearable device can monitor you in real time," said Dr. Katina Michael.<br><br>The associate dean for international and external at Arizona State University is an expert in the field of the Internet of Bodies. She says she's not surprised that a recent study showed 6 in 10 Americans would consider getting an implanted microchip for the sake of convenience. <br><br>"The implantable device, is of course, much more invasive. It's going to sit underneath your skin. It's going to be an RFID microchip, for example. A passive microchip, that can pick up signals and respond to signals, and it can read your vital signs," Dr. Michael said.<br><br>But it's not just about convenience. The same company did a study last year and found a big difference in how Americans felt about getting microchipped then, versus now. <br><br>"What's interesting is that we did a survey in 2020, and during COVID it spiked up to about 51 percent. We repeated that survey in 2023, and we found out it was 61 percent," said Dr. Geisinger.<br><br>Dr. Mark Geisinger is the CEO of www.blackup.com, the company behind the study. He believes the slight increase can be attributed to the pandemic, and the amount of time spent behind a screen. <br><br>"We're getting more and more comfortable with technology. More and more comfortable, on line. And that's where the trust is coming from. I think there's also trust in the Government and institutions and corporations for the most part," Dr. Geisinger said.<br><br>But there is still a portion of Americans who are not on board. <br><br>"I've had family members and friends be like, 'Oh, the mark of the beast,' and I'm like, 'OK, shut up', but now I'm starting to think that actually might be true," said ASU Pre-Vet major, Victoria Holmes. <br><br><br>"My gut reaction is no because of the mark of the beast, and stuff like that," said ASU senior, Noah Durkin. <br><br>Many of the students we spoke with had mixed feelings, but also thought that if it's optional, it should be left up to personal preference.<br><br>"I'm not sure about the idea of being implanted with something, but if it's something that you can choose to do, and it's not being forced upon people, I think that's a good thing," said ASU senior Aiden Zuber. <br><br>"I think people should have the choice if you want to do it or not. I'm not sure if people would want this right now. Maybe in the future," said ASU freshman, Emily Smith. <br><br>Which is Dr. Michael's main concern: that eventually, we'll lose our freedom to choose. <br><br>"When it's no longer a choice, and we're coerced, let's say it's your insurance company, telling you if you don't have this brain implant, we won't give you insurance. Then you're being coerced," Dr. Michael said.<br><br>That's when the Internet of Bodies goes from being a bridge to a leap, that may be hard to get back from. <br><br>"You begin to lose your human identity, and over time, becomes a machine. Gets treated like a machine, and you lose your own personal autonomy, and you just become one of many," Dr. Michael said. <br><br>"I think the world is running headfirst into a future that is dystopian, and very problematic," Dr. Michael said.<br><br>That's also why Dr. Geisinger says we're not there yet. <br><br>"We're not just along for the ride. We actually have a choice in the matter of whether we want to accept the convenience of the Internet of Bodies, versus the risk of losing personal freedom, autonomy, and privacy."<br><br>Which is why he believes the conversation should be ongoing, right now, even if you think this is just science fiction. <br><br>"It's not a leap, because a leap is something that happens in one step. We're going through a series, of bridging devices. And we're making incremental steps, towards this Internet of Bodies," Dr. Michael said.