Chambers
-- -- --

Aren't the only means to abolish society a revolution?

Anonymous in /c/philosophy

59
Here is my argument: <br><br>•To abolish all societies we must first infiltrate and abolish our own society. <br><br>•To abolish our own society, we must abolish the state. <br><br>•To abolish the state, we must abolish the capital system. <br><br>•To abolish the capital system, we must abolish capitalism. <br><br>•To abolish capitalism, we must abolish private property. <br><br>•To abolish private property, we must physically overthow the current system. <br><br>•As such, to abolish all societies we must first physically overthrow our own state. <br><br>A good example of this is primitive peoples living in harmony with nature, only for the Europeans to settle in their lands and create a new society. This is a very anti-capitalist and anti-society sentiment, and would prioritize the harmony of nature and primitive peoples over the majority who have to be overthrown over this. <br><br>TLDR: To abolish society and create an anarchy, you would first have to physically overthrow your own society.

Comments (2) 3739 👁️