I found something incredible. The scientific and zoological evidence for the existence of Bigfoot is something most people are unaware of, and if you read all this it will change you.

Greetings gentlemen. I recently learned of a man named Dr. Jeffrey Meldrum. He is a Ph.D professor of anatomy and anthropology, and he is the expert in the field of cryptozoology. Specifically, Bigfoot research. After reading through his research and other evidence for this creature, I am fairly convinced. The evidence is incredible. I decided to share as many of the key discoveries as I could find, and hopefully you will be as amazed and fascinated as I am. <br><br>First, let’s look at the arguments against the existence of Bigfoot. Most people would say that Bigfoot is not recognized or acknowledged by the scientific community or zoologists. The absence of evidence is evidence of absence. I’ll address these and other arguments. The evidence is absolutely scientific, and it is being used to prove that the creature is real. <br><br>Mcdonalds sells fries. If you want to criticize McDonald’s for not selling burgers, you are being ignorant. The scientific community is trying to prove Bigfoot exists with the evidence available, and it is being used to try and get Bigfoot recognized as a species. If you are criticizing the lack of evidence, you are ignorant of the fact that the evidence being collected is being used to prove it exists. <br><br>Mcdonalds sells burgers. If you are criticizing the lack of evidence of Bigfoot, you are ignorant of the fact that the evidence is out there, it simply hasn’t been used to prove it’s existence yet. <br><br>Now for the evidence. <br><br><br>First, the indigenous origins of Bigfoot lore. Bigfoot is only known as Bigfoot in modern American culture. Every single Native American tribe has described this creature for thousands of years. It’s real to them. The indigenous people are familiar with bears. They know what bears look like. They describe Bigfoot as being different. It’s not a bear. <br><br>Pretty much every single modern eyewitness description of Bigfoot matches the Native American lore of the creature. They describe it as tall, muscular, hairy, powerful odor, long arms, big feet, ape like. Pretty much the modern image of Sasquatch. <br><br>Second, the footprints. There are thousands of footprints that have been found that match the descriptions of the creature's feet. They are large. Most are 17-22 inches long and nearly 8 inches wide. The average footprint of a naked adult male is 10 inches long. For an idea of scale, Shaquille O'neil's feet are size 22. His barefoot imprint is about 15 inches. These footprints are massive. <br><br>Lots of photos and videos of footprints exist. Many of them are on hard ground. In leaves. In snow. Places where it would be impossible for a hoaxer to create a fake footprint. One of the most incredible discoveries in relation to footprints are the dermal ridges. Just like finger prints, we all have dermal ridges on the soles of our feet. We don't notice them, but they are there. The dermal ridges on our feet are unique to each person, just like finger prints. <br><br>In multiple locations across the continent where footprints have been discovered, the dermal ridges on the footprints have been analyzed. The same dermal ridges have popped up in multiple locations hundreds of miles apart. This suggests that multiple creatures exist. The dermal ridges on our feet do not change over our entire lives. <br><br>Footprints have been discovered in remote areas where there is no signs of people or buildings. Roads, houses, buildings, etc. No signs of human existence. The only way to get to these locations is by hiking through the wilderness for miles. The only animals with the capability of doing this are bears and mountain goats. Neither of those animals would leave footprints that match a human, but much larger. <br><br>Third, hair samples. Hundreds of hair samples have been discovered. These hair samples are something incredible. The hairs are about 3-5 times thicker than a human hair, and 3-5 times thinner than a bear hair. They do not match any known animal hair in North America. <br><br>Hair analysis can determine the species of an animal. The structure of the hair can determine the species, but it can be deceiving. In one instance, DNA analysis of a hair sample showed that it was from an unknown primate. This means that the structure of the hair sample could have resembled a known animal. DNA analysis is more accurate. <br><br>Fourth, DNA evidence. In multiple instances, hair samples have been DNA analyzed. In 2012, a peer reviewed study was done on over 100 hair samples, and it concluded that the samples were from an unknown primate. Multiple samples were from the same individual. This was the most significant DNA study ever done on Sasquatch samples. <br><br>Other DNA analyses have concluded that the samples were from an unknown primate, unknown mammal, or an unknown animal. <br><br>BUT, there is a problem. Not a single DNA analysis has been able to match the samples to a known animal. Including humans and apes. We know the DNA of humans, chimps, gorillas, bears, etc. If a DNA analysis were to come back as, "unknown primate, closest relative is humans or chimps," it would be huge. But it hasn't. The DNA analyses have concluded that the samples were from an unknown primate or unknown mammal. This indicates that the samples do not match any known DNA. <br><br>Fifth, the audio evidence. For decades, audio recordings of vocalizations have been discovered. The most incredible evidence is from the 1970s. A couple of men recorded ape like screams. When they played the recording back, a man with a Ph.D in phonetics analyzed the screams and concluded that they were a primate. <br><br>Skeptics will say those vocalizations were from owls. But owls do not scream like that. The analysis concluded that it was a primate. <br><br>Sixth, video evidence. The most famous video evidence of Bigfoot was filmed by Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin. It's known as the Patterson-Gimlin film. This film is from 1967. They were out on horses looking for Bigfoot. They were skeptical at first, but they ended up being believers. They filmed this footage which has been analyzed with modern software. <br><br>Modern analysis has concluded that whatever is in the film, it can not be a man in a suit. The creature's muscles ripple under it's skin. The way it moves is not human like. It runs with a strange gait, with it's arms held out to the side for balance. The creatures' torso moves in ways that humans are not able to do. <br><br>The creatures' body proportions do not match a human. A 6 foot man is 4-5 body heights tall. The creature in the film is 6 body heights tall. It's proportions do not match a human. <br><br>I could go on for hours. There is so much more evidence. The evidence is incredible. If you're skeptical, you need to do your own research. I have done a ton of research and I am fairly convinced. This creature is real. It is incredible. <br><br>EDIT: Thank you for the awards and kind words gentlemen. I am blown away by the support this post has gotten. I encourage you all to look into this further. The evidence is absolutely incredible. Bigfoot is real.