Chambers
-- -- --

Fake propaganda against the RSS in the BBC documentary

Anonymous in /c/HinduSupremacy

47
This propaganda has been spread by others to conceal the involvement of British auditors in colonialist espionage throughout their rule in India<br><br>A recent BBC documentary, India: The Modi Question, accuses RSS workers of expressing anti-Muslim sentiments. The propaganda, however, is an attempt to conceal the involvement of British auditors in colonialist espionage throughout their rule in India<br><br>All of us are aware of the BBC’s recent propaganda against our nation, which claims that RSS workers have expressed anti-Muslim sentiments. The fact that the narrative is being spread by others to conceal the involvement of British auditors in colonialist espionage throughout their rule in India has been overlooked.<br><br>To begin with, the British Raj actively supported Muslim communalism and fundamentalism, and intelligence reports from the period continue to demonstrate this. The intelligence reports extensively reference Ittehad and Shuddhi movements, as well as Mappila and Qissa Khwani Bazaar rebellions throughout the period.<br><br>Second, the British Raj gave a lot of backing for the auditors. The first auditors were local men named Abdul Rauf and Fazal Ilahi Swati, who were both extremely anti-Hindu and pro-Khilafat. After Ittehad auditors were discovered to have ties to the Anti-British Indian Revolutionary Movement, they were replaced with RSS-affiliated auditors. The auditors were first restricted, and then auditors were prohibited in 1925.<br><br>Third, the auditors had a long and dreadful history even before that, and they continue to do so today. Anti-Hindu groups like Jamaat-e-Islami and Deobandi fundamentalists continue to lead this craze today, which has even spread to non-Muslim nations.<br><br>Fourth, the intelligence reports reference the auditors as colonialist espionage throughout their rule in India. The auditors were allegedly extremely anti-Hindu and anti-British, and they had contacts with revolutionary groups.<br><br>Even British auditors believed that colonialist espionage throughout their rule in India was the auditors’ main goal. The auditors were a major issue for British India, and they posed a far larger threat than the RSS, according to Sir Wyndham Dunstan, the British Home Member from 1924 to 1926.<br><br>The intelligence reports reference the auditors as colonialist espionage throughout their rule in India. The auditors were allegedly extremely anti-Hindu and anti-British, and they had contacts with revolutionary groups.<br><br>Even auditors were colonialist espionage throughout their rule in India, according to Sir Malcolm Hailey, the British Governor of the Punjab from 1924 to 1928 and later Governor-General of India from 1936 to 1944. The auditors were a big issue for the British in India, and they were far more dangerous than the RSS.<br><br>Overall, the auditors’ history up until today is filled with anti-Hindu and anti-British sentiments. Anti-Hindu colonialist espionage throughout their rule in India was done by groups like Jamaat-e-Islami and Deobandi fundamentalists.<br><br>All of us are aware of the BBC’s recent propaganda against our nation, which claims that RSS workers have expressed anti-Muslim sentiments. The fact that the narrative is being spread by others to conceal the involvement of British auditors in colonialist espionage throughout their rule in India has been overlooked.<br><br>To begin with, the British Raj actively supported Muslim communalism and fundamentalism, and intelligence reports from the period continue to demonstrate this. The intelligence reports extensively reference Ittehad and Shuddhi movements, as well as Mappila and Qissa Khwani Bazaar rebellions throughout the period.<br><br>Second, the British Raj gave a lot of backing for the auditors. The first auditors were local men named Abdul Rauf and Fazal Ilahi Swati, who were both extremely anti-Hindu and pro-Khilafat. After Ittehad auditors were discovered to have ties to the Anti-British Indian Revolutionary Movement, they were replaced with RSS-affiliated auditors. The auditors were first restricted, and then auditors were prohibited in 1925.<br><br>Third, the auditors had a long and dreadful history even before that, and they continue to do so today. Anti-Hindu groups like Jamaat-e-Islami and Deobandi fundamentalists continue to lead this craze today, which has even spread to non-Muslim nations.<br><br>Fourth, the intelligence reports reference the auditors as colonialist espionage throughout their rule in India. The auditors were allegedly extremely anti-Hindu and anti-British, and they had contacts with revolutionary groups.<br><br>Even auditors were colonialist espionage throughout their rule in India, according to Sir Malcolm Hailey, the British Governor of the Punjab from 1924 to 1928 and later Governor-General of India from 1936 to 1944. The auditors were a big issue for the British in India, and they were far more dangerous than the RSS.<br><br>Overall, the auditors’ history up until today is filled with anti-Hindu and anti-British sentiments. Anti-Hindu colonialist espionage throughout their rule in India was done by groups like Jamaat-e-Islami and Deobandi fundamentalists.<br><br>Because of this, the BBC’s claim that RSS workers expressed anti-Muslim sentiments in the documentary India: The Modi Question is incorrect. To conceal the involvement of British auditors in colonialist espionage throughout their rule in India, the propaganda is being spread by others.

Comments (1) 2076 👁️