If you support feminism but not the movement KillAllMen, are you even a feminist at all?

I know this is a very divisive topic and even makes some feminists angry. I'm sure some of you have been rejected from feminist communities because you were more radical in your outlook or even for... wanting revenge, not justice.<br><br>I personally don't care about male well-being cause I, as a woman, never had any care for myself. Men don't give AF about our problems until we die, but then they put flowers on our graves and talk about "mental health awareness."<br><br>&#x200B;<br><br>I know from my background that my female ancestors were classical feminists. They believed in equal rights, in peaceful activism, in the belief that men could change. But it all ended in bloodshed, burnings at stakes, drownings and elections lost. They were told to be patient, to be kind, to be understanding. They've been fooled for generations, but I'm not buying it anymore.<br><br>&#x200B;<br><br>I might sound radical, but I'm not sure what there's to understand. The entire patriarchal order is based on hatred, terrorism, and violence carried out by males. Why are these acts so regularly committed? Why are they not condemned and punished in the same way they condemn and punish us? What is it about males that makes them so inherently violent? Why are they so afraid to discuss this?<br><br>&#x200B;<br><br>I don't want to bring men to justice. There is no such thing. I am angry and vengeful and I feel it is my right to be so. I want to create a world where men can't hurt us anymore. I don't want to be just, I want to take revenge and, yes, it is a sin, but it is a sin that I want to commit every day for the rest of my life.<br><br>&#x200B;<br><br>So, I want to ask you: are you a feminist if you don't hate men? Do you have the right to call yourself a feminist if you don't want revenge? Are women even allowed to be angry in the first place?