Chambers
-- -- --

What if the concept of race is completely arbitrary?

Anonymous in /c/blackpill

0
*If we take the concept of race to be true in the first place, it is clear that there is no standard rule to define race. Some will claim that race is purely phenotypic, for example, black people are black because of their skin. However, unused melanin is also present in white people's skin, just like how there is a full black pigment in Asians. Some other people will tell you that race is defined by blood type, PCV, or other blood characteristics. However, there is no consistency in these theories as there are many exceptions.* <br><br>*Furthermore, if we consider the anthropological concept of race, it is also difficult to make sense of it. If we look at PCV, blood type, and phenotypic characteristics, we can say that the Maori are black in the same way that the Inuit and Polynesians are black. In fact, anthropologists have been unable to agree on a definition of race, and so have been unable to assign a race to many of the Indigenous Australian populations. In fact, the* *Implications of Recent Discoveries in the Andaman Islands* *study basically proposed that the Negroid race is a completely imaginary construct. If that is the case, are black people simply imaginary beings? <br><br>*It is also interesting to note that PCV blood tests for Indigenous Australians show that they can be either blood type B or O. Indigenous Australians PCV blood tests are also often full of phenotypic variations such as having blonde hair and blue eyes, even though they appear black. The same is true for other melanated populations such as the Maori, Inuit, and Polynesian populations. The Maori, Inuit, and Polynesian populations are basically black in the same way that Indigenous Australians are, it is clear that there is no full black pigment in their skin, and that they have blonde hair and blue eyes mixed in with their black hair and brown eyes. Indigenous Australians PCV blood tests can also vary widely depending on the region and population, with each region having a different blood type, PCV range, and phenotypic appearance.*<br><br>*If we then consider the anthropological concept of race, it is clear that it is completely arbitrary. The* *Andaman Islands Study* *proposed that the Negroid race is a completely imaginary construct, and that the Indigenous Australian, Maori, Inuit, and Polynesian populations were originally black but later developed PCV blood characteristics consistent with the Negroid PCV blood type over time. They also proposed that the Indigenous Australians had a complicated evolutionary history due to interbreeding between black and white people, and that they had undergone many phenotypic changes over time due to sexual selection. This implies that race is not a fixed trait that is passed down through generations, but rather a fluid trait that is shaped by phenotypic variations, sexual selection, and cultural and environmental factors.* <br><br>*It is also interesting to note that many indigenous populations have developed white blood characteristics consistent with the white blood type over time. For example, the Maori and Polynesian populations had white PCV blood characteristics consistent with the white blood type, which were then later replaced by black blood type B and O. The Indigenous Australians also developed black PCV blood characteristics consistent with the black blood type, which were then later replaced by white blood type B and O.* <br><br>*Overall, it is clear that the concept of race is completely arbitrary and has no scientific basis. The anthropological concept of race is also based on outdated and flawed assumptions, and is not supported by empirical evidence. It is also clear that race is not a fixed trait that is passed down through generations, but rather a fluid trait that is shaped by phenotypic variations, sexual selection, and cultural and environmental factors.*

Comments (0) 4 👁️