The reason why we have to tolerate CCP spam is because it is less harmful than any alternative. The real problem is that people generally cannot tell what is genuine and what is fake.

This sub talks about CCP spam, but it is actually a symptom of a larger problem. CCP spam is just a small part of a broader disinformation campaign. There are other actors such as Russia and other authoritarian states, but there is no unified approach to address these issues. <br><br>The real problem is that people generally cannot tell what is genuine and what is fake. This is a problem that democracy does not have a good solution for. CCP disinformation campaigns are flooding the internet, but that is not the main issue. The main issue is people's inability to differentiate between fake/disinformation and genuine information.<br><br>In this post I argue that the reason why we have to tolerate CCP spam is that it is less harmful than any alternative. The real problem is that people generally cannot tell what is genuine and what is fake. <br><br>I use CCP spam as an example to explain my point because of the relation with this sub, but this problem goes beyond CCP spam. CCP spam is just a symptom of a larger problem. <br><br><br>The reason why we have to tolerate CCP spam is that it is less harmful than any alternative.<br><br>In this post I argue that the reason why we have to tolerate CCP spam is that it is less harmful than any alternative. The real problem is that people generally cannot tell what is genuine and what is fake. <br><br>The reason why we have to tolerate CCP spam is because it is less harmful than any alternative. Instead of tolerating CCP spam, if we try to suppress it, it would lead to an increase in distrust. This is because people are generally unaware of the disinformation campaigns. If these posts are all deleted, it will lead to a lack of awareness of the threats of CCP spam and mistrust of the government. <br><br>The lack of awareness of CCP spam is a tragedy that we cannot change. There is no straightforward way to increase awareness, and it is impossible to make ordinary people care about CCP spam. Ordinary people are more interested in entertainment than in learning about CCP spam/disinformation. On this sub, we have posts that try to educate people about CCP spam. It is all in vain as people are largely apathetic towards it. <br><br>Modern China is a highly authoritarian state, and modern CCP is far more disreputable than Nazi Germany. But ordinary people are largely unaware of these issues. Modern China is far more dangerous than Nazi Germany, and CCP is far more disreputable than the Nazi party. But people today are largely unaware of these issues. <br><br>We cannot educate people about CCP spam/disinformation, and it would lead to mistrust if we suppress CCP spam. So we have to tolerate CCP spam. The real issue is that people are generally unaware of the disinformation campaigns and cannot tell what is genuine and what is fake. <br> <br>The real problem is that people generally cannot tell what is genuine and what is fake.<br> <br>The reason why we have to tolerate CCP spam is that it is less harmful than any alternative. But that does not explain why we cannot educate people about how to differentiate between genuine information and fake information. <br> <br>It is impossible to educate people about how to differentiate between genuine information and fake information. It is not very hard to educate people about how to differentiate between genuine information and fake information, but it is impossible to make people care about it. <br> <br>It is not very hard to educate people about how to differentiate between genuine information and fake information. There are some skills that can help people differentiate between genuine information and fake information/disinformation. But it is impossible to make people care about it. It is incredibly hard to make ordinary people care about this issue. <br> <br>Generally, people go to school to learn about various subjects, but few schools teach critical thinking skills that can help people differentiate between genuine information and fake information. It is not very hard to teach these skills, but it is impossible to make people care about it. <br> <br>Ordinary people are generally more interested in entertainment than in learning about these skills. This is not a good thing, but ordinary people have no incentive to spend time learning about these skills. <br> <br>It is impossible to make ordinary people care about these skills, and it is impossible to educate people about how to differentiate between genuine information and fake information. So people generally cannot tell what is genuine and what is fake. <br> <br><br> <br>In summary, the reason why we have to tolerate CCP spam is that it is less harmful than any alternative. Instead of tolerating CCP spam, if we try to suppress it, it would lead to an increase in distrust. The lack of awareness of CCP spam is a tragedy that we cannot change. There is no straightforward way to increase awareness, and it is impossible to make ordinary people care about CCP spam/disinformation. <br> <br> <br>But even if we could increase awareness, that does not explain why we cannot educate people about how to differentiate between genuine information and fake information. It is not very hard to educate people about how to differentiate between genuine information and fake information, but it is impossible to make people care about it. There are some skills that can help people differentiate between genuine information and fake information. But it is impossible to make people care about it. So people generally cannot tell what is genuine and what is fake. <br> <br> <br>In conclusion, the reason why we have to tolerate CCP spam is that it is less harmful than any alternative. The real problem is that people generally cannot tell what is genuine and what is fake. <br> <br> <br><br><br>TLDR: the reason why we have to tolerate CCP spam is that it is less harmful than any alternative. The real problem is that people generally cannot tell what is genuine and what is fake.