I'm so sick of Chambers's stupid logical fallacies.

I'm not a Christian or a Muslim, I'm an atheist. Because of this, I get grouped in with the people who have a logical fallacy saying "You can't prove there isn't a God, how can you be an atheist?" NO. Atheists are people who aren't a theist, meaning we have no belief in any God of any kind. There's a difference between agnosticism and atheism. Yes, we cannot prove there isn't a god, but we don't believe in one. And then there's the people who think we all believe in science or that we have science arguments to prove our side. NO. Being an atheist doesn't mean you worship science, unlike what some religious people think. It's honestly stupid to me how many times I have to correct people who call me an agnostic when I'm not; I am 100% atheist. There is no arguments to prove or disprove the existence of a God, so I don't believe in one. This is why I think a lot of atheists choose to assume there is no god, because people will just throw science arguments at us; I am an atheist because I don't have a theistic belief, yet people call me agnostic when I don't have a reason to believe in a God, therefore I don't. It's stupid to me, and I'm really sick of this across Reddit.<br><br>Edit: To clarify, I'm not saying this to offend any religious person, this is to speak out against atheists and agnostics who have the same idea and to show people who this is a problem.