Mandated male circumcision as a prevalence of low income males would significantly reduce the spread of various STDs, and()-> protect public heath.

Mandated male circumcision as a prevalence of low income males would significantly reduce the spread of various STDs, and()-> protect public heath and child health as well as reduce the costs of socialised medicine. Only males whose parents believe circumcision is contrary to their religious beliefs would be exempt, this is the policy in Australia.<br><br>Edit: I'm not arguing male circumcision should be compulsory on all males, only as a prevalence of low income males.