We pretend that stereotypical male interests like video games and fantasy or cars or sports are male because men like them, but really it's because they're part of a conditioning program designed to keep men where they are

Look at the profile of a typical alpha male celebrity, Keanu Reeves for example. In interviews they like to talk about their engineering degree, love if cars, how much they get into the technical side of film and how they can't help but feel like there's some sort of outside influence controlling the population. They're clearly intelligent dudes because they're essentially paid to act like they're not, and if you notice, they're paid to act in roles that are specifically designed to influence a certain part of the population in a certain way, for various goals.<br><br>I think that the reason why most stereotypical male male interests, or hobbies, are stereotypically male is because they have a technical and or engineering aspect to them. Love cars? You love how they look, sure, but you also love to tinker with them and you're likely an engineer. That's because most men are naturally inclined to have a high technical aptitude. Most men are naturally more inclined to be analytical, rational and technical. Of course there are outliers, and if you're a man who gets into sewing, that's cool, and you should do it. But why is stereotypical "gamer" male? Because it's technical, and most men are technically inclined. Why are most coders and engineers men? Because most men are inclined that way. A man is inclined to figure out how things work, to figure out how to make them work better, and to get to the bottom of things. Science, tell me about science. History, tell me about history. I could read a 20 page article about science or history, but you couldn't pay me to read a Cosmo article. If you notice, almost all of the most important inventions and discoveries have been made by men. I'm not saying that women can't do or don't do these things, I'm saying that most men are technically inclined, and that's why our hobbies are technical.<br><br>But have you noticed that we're being conditioned away from those things? Like really, really conditioned. Games used to be about how to get to the end. Now it's about grinding and buying in game currency to get skins. Cars used to be about performance, now they're all about appearance. Can you imagine if Ford made a terrible looking car that went 300 miles an hour? You'd think it was designed by aliens or something. I'm sure they could do it, but they won't. Why? Because if they did, men would be inspired by it, and they would tinker with cars all day and see how much cooler they could make them, and then they would create new companies that would eventually compete against Ford. When you buy a game, most of the time, it's a AAA game designed by a huge company to keep you addicted. It's almost impossible to start your own game development company nowadays, but years ago you could. You had to technical and inventive to do it. Nowadays you just have to be a fuckin idiot and throw some money at a publisher. Why? Because it keeps our technical inclination away from doing anything of value with it. Why do you think every celebrity is tellin us to get outside and play? They know that if we can just focus our inclination on something outside of what's popular, we will create something big. And I think they know it.<br><br>I think that men are naturally inclined to try and uncover the truth, and so we must be conditioned to be distracted from that pursuit. Video games, instead of teaching us how to get the the end, now they waste our time with meaningless fuckery. I think that we're being conditioned away from doing anything that's actually important or valuable, and that's why we're male. Because we're not male, we're just being kept down.<br><br>Edit: some people are saying coders and engineers have always been male because women weren't allowed to be in those positions, but why? Why weren't women allowed to engineering positions if they wanted them? Why did they have to fight for them? Women have always been allowed to be teachers, why weren't they allowed to be engineers? It's because it's an important position, and women in those positions would undo the conditioning that we have today to keep men in check.