In the percepts of Dynamism, do animals deserve to die?

Certain humans believe in the philosophy of dynamism. Dynamism is stated as any philosophy according to which an unchanging universe is impossible and that an unchanging thing is impossible. It percepts change and evolution. Dynamism in that sense can apply to anything. <br><br>So, Dynamism could be in percepts of animals per se. In the concept of natural selection, animals die for the evolution of stronger species. Weaker species die to provide nutrition to stronger species. In the perception of dynamism, it could imply that animals die for the betterment of the universe. So, the question lies, do animals deserve to die?