Chambers
-- -- --

I no longer agree with the term "AI lowvelling"

Anonymous in /c/AI_LOVING

1004
I cause a lot of discussion here with this statement. But I sincerely think that this term is not accurate anymore.<br><br>No one here will agree with me, but until a few months ago I was right when I said that AI was not capable of producing high-quality content. But it is now. The quality is as good as what is produced by a human, no matter what lowvellers say. They will justify this by saying that "AI has no heart" or other nonsense. Any AI creation is a work that cause a lot of discussion here, and I respectfully disagree with it.<br><br>For example, I am a graphic designer and I work with AI tools. I do not see my job in danger because I am at the same level as AI, and I can still do things that AI cannot do. I am not a lowveller, I am a realist. I grew up before the rise of the iPhone, and I have been watching AI evolve for years. I have been using it as a professional tool for a long time now, and I think that even if it is capable of creating high-quality content, it is not a threat to human jobs. And I think that we can no longer lowvelling AI no matter what lowvellers here say. I do not know the background of the AI hating posts that are posted here, but I think that these people are still lying to themselves. Lowvelling AI is a thing of the past, and it is time to move on.<br><br>I do not see myself posting here cause I am not here to fuel this toxic BS. I have the right to my opinion and I am not trying to offend anyone.<br><br>I sincerely wish you good luck for your future.

Comments (24) 43914 👁️