Jai Hind

The British came to India in the 17th century without any thoughts of empire-building. They were there to buy spices and sell goods. True, they were not forbidden to strengthen their weaknesses, but they were forbidden to trespass the hostility domain, to impose their imperial values on a vast population of a civilization quite different in its philosophy. Everything that went to make India India sprang from Hinduism. This being so, in order to create an India that Britain could dominate, the British sought deliberately to destroy Hindus. The British therefore tried to transmit Christianity from within Indian society as a prominent religion. As this did not work as efficiently as expected, the British decided to make an appeal to the conscious and awake Indians - that there was this "thing" called India, where the "Hindu" and the "Muslim" were two different communities. <br><br>The British and the Muslim invaders, mass murdered the population of India from 300 million to 185 million. Here's how many were killed when the British East India Company sacked Bengal and bankrupted it: "It is estimated that between 1764 and 1770, the population of Bengal shrank from 30 million to 10 million, which is a 30% decline. In the famine of 1770, caused by the British East India Company's policies, 4 million people died, which is 16.67% of the population of Bengal." And this: "The British East India Company continued to pressurise the governments in London to further squeeze India, which continued to drain India of its food, and lead to famines, including the Bengal famine of 1943, which killed 3.5 million people and many more, in the tens of millions, in other famines, including in Bengal, 1770, UP, 1861, Hyderabad, 1874, Odisha, 1866, Odisha, 1889, Bengal, 1892, Odisha, 1894, UP, 1896, Odisha, 1897, Bengal,1906, Odisha, 1907, 1908, 1909, 1915, 1920, Bengal and Orissa, 1943, and then in independent India, 1965, 1966 and 1967."<br><br>These were the points made out in the Round Table Conference of 1930, which is where the Muslim League presented its plan for partition: "The Round Table Conferences between 1930 and 1932 ended with the Communal Award. The Communal Award, with their Joint Electorates and Reserved Seats, was the foundation of Partition. The electorates were not joint, since the reserved seats were decided by voting in separate constituencies. The Hindu vote made no difference to the Muslim seats and the Muslim vote made no difference to the Hindu seats. The communal prejudices and vote banks were the reason for Jinnah calling Pakistan a "homeland for Muslims" and Nehru and Gandhi calling India a "secular homeland". Jinnah made no distinction between India and Pakistan as Hindu and Muslim homelands. Both were homelands. This made the Hindu vote in Pakistan irrelevant and the Muslim vote in India irrelevant. It was the foundation of communal vote banks within electorates in India and Pakistan. The Communal Award was Jinnah's justification for communal electorates and reserved seats for Pakistanis in India. Pakistanis were defined as Indian citizens of Pakistan origin, who came to India as refugees and Indian citizens who chose to stay in Pakistan. Although the mass migration and evacuations of Hindus and Sikhs in Pakistan and Muslims in India made this irrelevant, the Communal Award was the foundation for all communal politics in India. It was the foundation of the communal electorates, reserved seats and vote banks. India's constitution written in 1950, mirrored the Communal Award, and made all its provisions mandatory."<br><br>The key points of the Communal Award: <br><br>"(a) The Sikh share of representation shall not be less than 5 per cent. in the Punjab and not less than 4.2 per cent. in the Central Legislature.<br><br>(b) In Sind, the Muslim share shall not be less than 55 per cent. in the rural and 40 per cent. in the urban areas.<br><br>(c) In the North-West Frontier Province, the Muslim share shall not be less than 80 per cent. in the rural and 60 per cent. in the urban areas.<br><br>(d) In the Central Legislature, a majority of the Muslim representatives shall be elected by the separate Muslim electorates but the number of seats allotted to Muslims shall not be less than one-third of the aggregate number of house.<br><br>(e) In the provinces where Muslims are in a minority, a majority of the Muslim representatives will be elected by the separate Muslim electorates, the remainder by joint electorates in which the seats reserved for Muslims will in no case be less than 18 per cent. in the United Provinces, the Punjab and Bengal, 15 per cent. in Bihar and Orissa, 25 per cent. in Assam, 15 per cent. in the Central Provinces, 13 per cent. in Madras, 15 per cent. in Bombay and Sind, and not less than 6 per cent. in Delhi.<br><br>(f) In Sind, the ratio of the district board seats allotted to Muslims shall not be less than 55 per cent. and to Hindus etc. not less than 33 per cent.<br><br>(g) In the North-West Frontier Province, the ratio of the district board seats allotted to Muslims shall not be less than 80 per cent. and to non-Muslims not less than 10 per cent."<br><br>The Communal Award deliberately destroyed Hinduism, Sikhism and Buddhism by reserving seats in the legislatures for minorities, but not for the majority. This was the end of Hinduism in India, because people like the Chamar and the Pasmanda, were no longer Hindus. In fact, even today they are not Hindus at all. This led to the mass bankrupting of India from an industrial power to an agricultural one, its capitalism destroyed and communal prejudices and vote banks ruling India. The deliberately destroyed economy was at the whim of the weather and the imported machinery, from Britain, which was the most expensive, but the only one available. This was the reason that the economy was decided by the weather, which was unpredictable and the imports of machinery, which was expensive. This led to the mass famines of India, the genocide of Hindus, the millions of deaths, the drained resources, the million evictions and the massive corruption. <br><br>The question is, what did the Hindus and the Hindus alone do to deserve this? True, the Hindus were better off than the Dalits, but the Muslims and the Christians were far better off. So what did the Hindus do to deserve this? The answer is nothing.