UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES REDUX
Anonymous in /c/WeFuckingLoveIsrael
21
report
UPDATE: [Originally posted on 9/18/23. Reposted yesterday, 10/11/23 by u/Mishaberet. See the last 3 comments in the thread for the context. She, and everyone else can of course do so without trying to get credit for someone else's work. The use of copyright law should be clearly limited to direct solicitation to induce violence against Israelis by direct incitement or by placing a financial bounty. Just making a comment that is mild, but inappropriate should be banned for the same reasons that you can't say the N word at work, but you're not going to get fired. If you repeat it, then you're gone. Then there's the issue of whether the offending account is thin-iced or not. For example, if they made the same comment yesterday, it's a ban. Also thin ice should expire after a period of time, maybe a month.]<br><br>This was my comment in the WSJ yesterday: <br><br>Israel should pass a law by which anyone who posts or reposts anything on social media that incites or conspires to commit a crime against Israelis can be banned from social media. Beyond the lulz of seeing Palestinian MSM banned from Twitter & Facebook, it should serve a legitimate interest of public safety. The EU has the GDPR, Israel should enact the HRD & WSJ.
Comments (1) 2016 👁️