You do not recognize her as your daughter, but she as your parent. Same with all other kinds of incest. It's the component of origin, not just the one of generating

Hopefully with this I have solved the paradox of incest (and only in this message I solved it). Who do you think is responsible in the incest relationship: the child or the parent? If a child asks a parent to get closer, is it the child's fault? Same with the parent and the child. <br><br>It's not about who makes the first move in an incestuous relationship, or who tries to sexually abuse, either the child or the parent. This is about the origin of that sentiment, more than who started the relationship. <br><br>I think the child is the one who cannot be held accountable for incest. Who created the parent? The child, since she gives birth. I think it's not about who is physically related or not. It's about who is the starting point or "origin" of a family relationship. In a parent-child relationship, it's only the child, because they are "the beginning" of the relationship, because if they didn't exist, there would be no family relationship between them. <br><br>So, I think incest is something that simplifies relationships in a family. I think the birth of a child simplifies things. It's a matter of origin, in words. The beginning of a parent-child relationship. <br><br>This makes it not so forbidden to think that the child is always the origin in any kind of incest, including incest between siblings. It's something that happens at the moment of birth. It's not something that happens when the relationship is already established.<br><br>In short, incest is something that is accounted for, whatever happens in a family. The nuisances that arise from an incestuous relationship are not the fault of the child. I think incest should not be dismissed.