CMV: (Regular) Pornography is more than a tool to help you find your sexual identity, it is a lot of actual sexualised violence of women

I am a university student doing a coursework on a video about pornography. <br><br><br>From my research, I have used the term 'Regular Pornography' to refer to a typical pornografic content that you can find out there, while the 'Radical Pornography' refer to the pornografic content you can't actually find right away which often (or always I'm not entirely sure) depicts abuse, violence and such. <br><br><br>While often some people argue that pornography is a tool for them to explore their sexuality as it teaches what an attraction to one or another gender looks like. Regular pornography does not actually depict a healthy sex. Instead it is often acted in a way of power, dominance and violence towards one gender (typically women) in a form of dehumanisation in favour of another (typically men), and it should not end up like that (or even at all) in real life. It is alarming that many regular porn viewers actually want to put the things they've watched into practice, and it is proven that it would led to sexual violence and assault. <br><br><br>Some of you might argue "But this is regular porn. Radical porn is the one which often (or always I'm not entirely sure) depicts abuse, violence and such." <br><br><br>While the Radical porn does often (or always I'm not entirely sure) depicts abuse, violence and such, I would argue that Radical porn is just a radical version of regular porn in the first place. I mean, if Radical porn is such radical and can't actually be found right away, why is it existing in the first place? There must be some reason why Radical porn was produced and it is (Regular porn) that is the main reason. <br><br><br>Does it really sound right for me to say that Radical porn is basically the extreme version of the Regular porn which is the porn that can be easily found, viewed and used by the public? It's not like Radical porn (or even (Radical) Pornography) is made from thin air, it is made from a certain idea, and the idea may have come from (Regular) pornography in the first place. While regular porn is not actually radical, and it does not often (or not at all I'm not entirely sure) depicts abuse, violence and such, some ideas in regular porn can sometimes (or always I'm not entirely sure) led to radical porn to be existed in the first place. <br><br><br>If Radical porn is such radical and can't actually be found right away (and it often or always can't be found by viewers I'm not entirely sure), why is it existing in the first place? There must be some reason why Radical porn was produced and it is (Regular porn) that is the main reason. <br><br><br>So, as Radial porn is a radical version of regular porn in the first place, that would mean that regular porn is also abused, violent and sexualised violence of the other gender, it just isn't radical when it comes to the abuse, violence and sexualised violence of other gender. It's not like Radial porn (or even (Radical) Pornography) is made from thin air, it is made from a certain idea, and the idea may have come from (Regular) pornography in the first place. While regular porn is not actually radical, and it does not often (or not at all I'm not entirely sure) depicts abuse, violence and such, some ideas in regular porn can sometimes (or always I'm not entirely sure) led to radical porn to be existed in the first place. <br><br><br>While Pornography is (often) used as a tool for people to explore their sexuality as it teaches what an attraction to one or another gender looks like. Pornography is not actually a tool for people to explore their sexuality as it teaches what an attraction to one or another gender looks like. If Pornography would truly be a tool to learn to explore our sexuality, then we would not have Radical porn.<br><br><br>One of the main reasons you should watch pornography is to satisfy your sexual desire as an adult, but I would argue that what you are consuming is actually sexualised violence. Pornography is not actually sex, it is not even a safe sex practice.<br><br><br>Pornography is not actually made to satisfy your sexual desire, but it is made to satisfy another person sexual desire of the other gender. That being said, you would often (or always I'm not entirely sure) find yourself consuming sexualised violence that the other gender is experiencing while actually the ones who are performing the sexualised violence are your gender. I think this should be the most alarming point, porn viewers would often (or always I'm not entirely sure) find themselves consuming sexualised violence that the other gender is experiencing while actually the ones who are performing the sexualised violence are their gender. <br><br><br>To put it simply, when you watch pornography you would often (or always I'm not entirely sure) find yourself consuming sexualised violence that the other gender is experiencing while actually the ones who are performing the sexualised violence are your gender. <br><br><br>I would argue that it is alarming if porn viewers would often (or always I'm not entirely sure) find themselves consuming sexualised violence that the other gender is experiencing while actually the ones who are performing the sexualised violence are their gender. Porn viewers would often (or always I'm not entirely sure) find themselves consuming sexualised violence that the other gender is experiencing while actually the ones who are performing the sexualised violence are their gender, and it should not end up like that (or even at all) in real life. <br><br><br>If porn viewers would often (or always I'm not entirely sure) find themselves consuming sexualised violence that the other gender is experiencing while actually the ones who are performing the sexualised violence are their gender, then it would actually led to sexual violence and assault. I did not really research deep enough into Radical porn to be honest, but I'm glad that I was not wrong about this case (Hence it's radical, no?). While regular porn is not actually radical, and it does not often (or not at all I'm not entirely sure) depicts abuse, violence and such, some ideas in regular porn can sometimes (or always I'm not entirely sure) led to sexual violence and assault. Porn viewers would often (or always I'm not entirely sure) find themselves consuming sexualised violence that the other gender is experiencing while actually the ones who are performing the sexualised violence are their gender, and it should not end up like that (or even at all) in real life. <br><br><br>The viewing of pornography has been associated with a wide variety of negative outcomes, not all of which are based on the sexualised violence aspect of it. It's not like radical porn (or even radical pornography) is made from thin air, it is made from a certain idea, and the idea may have come from (regular) pornography in the first place. While regular porn is not actually radical, and it does not often (or not at all I'm not entirely sure) depicts abuse, violence and such, some ideas in regular porn can sometimes (or always I'm not entirely sure) led to radical porn to be existed in the first place. While the radical porn does often (or always I'm not entirely sure) depicts abuse, violence and such, I would argue that radical porn is just a radical version of regular porn in the first place. I mean, if radical porn is such radical and can't actually be found right away, why is it existing in the first place? There must be some reason why radical porn was produced and it is (Regular porn) that is the main reason. So, as radical porn is a radical version of regular porn in the first place, that would mean that regular porn is also abused, violent and sexualised violence of the other gender, it just isn't radical when it comes to the abuse, violence and sexualised violence of other gender. It's not like radical porn (or even radical pornography) is made from thin air, it is made from a certain idea, and the idea may have come from (regular) pornography in the first place. While regular porn is not actually radical, and it does not often (or not at all I'm not entirely sure) depicts abuse, violence and such, some ideas in regular porn can sometimes (or always I'm not entirely sure) led to radical porn to be existed in the first place. Porn viewers would often (or always I'm not entirely sure) find themselves consuming sexualised violence that the other gender is experiencing while actually the ones who are performing the sexualised violence are their gender, and it should not end up like that (or even at all) in real life. <br><br><br>So, while Pornography is (often) used as a tool for people to explore their sexuality as it teaches what an attraction to one or another gender looks like, Pornography does not teach what an attraction to one or another gender looks like. It should not end up like that and it is actually sexualised violence. <br><br><br>Regular Pornography often (or always I'm not entirely sure) comes with a lot of actual sexualised violence of women (which might be a tool for men to know how to attract women). Regular pornography is not actually a lot of sexualised violence of women, it is just sexualised violence of the other gender. That being said, you would often (or always I'm not entirely sure) find yourself consuming sexualised violence that the other gender is experiencing while actually the ones who are performing the sexualised violence are your gender. I would argue that it is alarming that many regular porn viewers would often (or always I'm not entirely sure) find themselves consuming sexualised violence that the other gender is experiencing while they are the gender that performs the sexualised violence, and it often (or always I'm not entirely sure) leads to the sexualised violence in real life. <br><br><br>&#x200B;<br><br>**