CMV: It's insane that someone can be homeless in a society that has unsold houses at full scale.

If someone has no place to live and no means to pay for housing, I think it makes sense that the government should offer a place to live, but not necessarily assist with other expenses such as food. The government can require the homeless person to work in the form of a job and pay taxes but a small percentage of their income from said job can go to the government to purchase the house they live in.<br><br>If this seems too extreme to some people, then the government can just rent out homes, and rent out homes at a small price. It's not like the government is losing money from empty houses that they own that they have already taxed people to pay for.<br><br>It's insane that people starve in a society where food is thrown out, but I believe that if someone worked for food, they would be more likely to finish it. This logic can be applied to houses.