I was shouted down for saying that if 6 billion people are at risk of mass starvation, I don't think we need to be more worried about protecting our "rights" to own AR15s than we are about a few people with fetuses dying in child birth.

I don't think we need to protect a "right" to semi-auto rifles designed for war if it's going to make it harder for women to get medical care in life-threatening situations.<br><br>Why is the "right" to own a semi-auto AR15 rifle more important than the right to not starve to death? <br><br>Why is this "right" more important than the right to not be shot to death by some deranged psycho? <br><br>Why is the "right" to an AR15 more important than the right to get medical care in life-threatening situations?