CMV: It is objectively better to go for a "hybrid" approach to vaccine distribution.

I've been seeing a lot of back and forth over vaccine distribution, with some arguing that we should be giving it out in the order of oldest first (or prioritizing those most likely to die or be in danger), while others are arguing it should be given to first responders, teachers, frontline workers, etc.<br><br>My position is that both of these are valid and should be done simultaneously, or in the case of the US, we've already been doing it. It is better to go down the list of people most likely to die (the elderly, those with preexisting conditions, etc.) but we also should prioritize people that are in danger if they contract Covid (first responders, healthcare workers, teachers, etc.) This is why I've been receiving the vaccine as a nurse (I'm 23, so I'm not even eligible yet) at my hospital.<br><br>What I believe this is because of the following: it's better for both people who are in danger of dying, as well as those who are in danger if they contract the virus. For example, I have a family member that is 78 years old and has heart issues. I know that he is at a higher risk of dying if he contracts covid (due to the age and pre-existing conditions) and if he survives, he will be out of work for several weeks to months. If we were to only give it out in the order of oldest first, this would be very bad for him. However, I am also friends with several teachers who have been dealing with a huge influx of covid patients (both at home and at work) and are at a higher risk of contracting it, especially now with the omicron variant. If we were to only give it to the elderly first, this could be detrimental for my friends and their families. By going the hybrid approach, both my family member and my friends can get vaccinated.<br><br>I'd love to hear the other side of the argument, so please share!