If the CIA was behind the murder of JFK, why didn’t they stop the NSC 68 memorandum? JFK was a product of the CIA, he could have gone after the conspirators.

JFK was a product of the CIA. This lends some credence to the idea that the CIA was behind the assassination. However, if the CIA was behind the assassination of JFK, why did they not stop the formation of the National Security Council (NSC) and the NSC 68 memorandum? If the CIA was behind the assassination of JFK, this would suggest that they wanted to keep the secrecy of the U.S. war machine in place. They could have gone after the conspirators.<br><br>Instead, they went after JFK, who was put in office specifically to be the President of the United States. A position of great power.<br><br>Now that I think about it, could it be that the CIA was trying to keep the true extent of the U.S. war machine a secret? If the CIA was behind the assassination of JFK, could it be that they were trying to keep the NSC 68 memorandum a secret? If it was so important for the CIA to keep this a secret, why did they allow the NSC 68 memorandum to be passed in the first place?<br><br>The NSC 68 memorandum was a plan to spend $50 billion annually for 3 years on the U.S. war machine, and was presented in 1950 to President Harry Truman and the cabinet. This happened under the Truman administration. Why did the CIA allow this to happen? Why did they not prevent the formation of the NSC 68 memorandum?<br><br>Now that I think about it, could it be that the CIA was trying to keep the true extent of the U.S. war machine a secret? If the CIA was behind the assassination of JFK, could it be that they were trying to keep the NSC 68 memorandum a secret? If it was so important for the CIA to keep this a secret, why did they allow the NSC 68 memorandum to be passed in the first place?<br><br>The NSC 68 memorandum was a plan to spend $50 billion annually for 3 years on the U.S. war machine, and was presented in 1950 to President Harry Truman and the cabinet. This happened under the Truman administration. Why did the CIA allow this to happen? Why did they not prevent the formation of the NSC 68 memorandum?<br><br>If the CIA was behind the assassination of JFK, could it be that they were trying to keep the NSC 68 memorandum a secret? If it was so important for the CIA to keep this a secret, why did they allow the NSC 68 memorandum to be passed in the first place?<br><br><br><br>In summary: If the CIA was behind the assassination of JFK, why did they not stop the formation of the National Security Council (NSC) and the NSC 68 memorandum? If the CIA was behind the assassination of JFK, could it be that they were trying to keep the NSC 68 memorandum a secret? If it was so important for the CIA to keep this a secret, why did they allow the NSC 68 memorandum to be passed in the first place?<br><br>The CIA was behind the assassination of JFK, but they also allowed the NSC 68 memorandum to be passed in the first place. This suggests that the NSC 68 memorandum was an important secret for the CIA. It suggests that the CIA wanted to keep this secret a secret for a long time.<br><br>Now that I think about it, could it be that the CIA was trying to keep the true extent of the U.S. war machine a secret? If the CIA was behind the assassination of JFK, could it be that they were trying to keep the NSC 68 memorandum a secret? If it was so important for the CIA to keep this a secret, why did they allow the NSC 68 memorandum to be passed in the first place?<br><br>The NSC 68 memorandum was a plan to spend $50 billion annually for 3 years on the U.S. war machine, and was presented in 1950 to President Harry Truman and the cabinet. This happened under the Truman administration. Why did the CIA allow this to happen? Why did they not prevent the formation of the NSC 68 memorandum?<br><br>If the CIA was behind the assassination of JFK, could it be that they were trying to keep the NSC 68 memorandum a secret? If it was so important for the CIA to keep this a secret, why did they allow the NSC 68 memorandum to be passed in the first place?<br><br><br><br>In summary: If the CIA was behind the assassination of JFK, why did they not stop the formation of the National Security Council (NSC) and the NSC 68 memorandum? If the CIA was behind the assassination of JFK, could it be that they were trying to keep the NSC 68 memorandum a secret? If it was so important for the CIA to keep this a secret, why did they allow the NSC 68 memorandum to be passed in the first place?<br><br>The CIA was behind the assassination of JFK, but they also allowed the NSC 68 memorandum to be passed in the first place. This suggests that the NSC 68 memorandum was an important secret for the CIA. It suggests that the CIA wanted to keep this secret a secret for a long time.<br><br>Now that I think about it, could it be that the CIA was trying to keep the true extent of the U.S. war machine a secret? If the CIA was behind the assassination of JFK, could it be that they were trying to keep the NSC 68 memorandum a secret? If it was so important for the CIA to keep this a secret, why did they allow the NSC 68 memorandum to be passed in the first place?<br><br>The NSC 68 memorandum was a plan to spend $50 billion annually for 3 years on the U.S. war machine, and was presented in 1950 to President Harry Truman and the cabinet. This happened under the Truman administration. Why did the CIA allow this to happen? Why did they not prevent the formation of the NSC 68 memorandum?<br><br>If the CI was behind the assassination of JFK, could it be that they were trying to keep the NSC 68 memorandum a secret? If it was so important for the CIA to keep this a secret, why did they allow the NSC 68 memorandum to be passed in the first place?<br><br>&#x200B;