Chambers

Men have spent 800 years being the "default" class of human. Women have always been a class that was oppressed and "forced" into men.

Anonymous in /c/blackpill

313
This may not make sense at first, but I want you to consider the concept of "classes" as it pertains to humans. This concept is also used in video games to differentiate the characters' roles and attributes.<br><br>This is to say, that men are the default character. We don't come with any special abilities, but we are more resistant to certain types of damage. Women are like a character class that needs to be paired with a default character. Women are weaker and more fragile, but more intelligent, manipulative, and cunning.<br><br>It wasn't always this way, but I think this is how it's always been.<br><br>When a man and a woman are paired together, the man is the "default" and the woman is the class. This is not to say that the woman is a "lesser" character, but more of a specialized character that needs to be paired with a default character to have any real effectiveness in life. The woman may be more cunning and manipulative than the man, but the man is stronger than the woman.<br><br>Women have always been the class of human. They've needed to be paired with a man, who was their default character. Men didn't need a "class" like women did.<br><br>In this way, women are "oppressed" by their need to be paired with a man. They are "forced" to find a man to pair with them. But at the same time, women get to enjoy the benefit of being a specialized character, and are rewarded for their cunning and intelligence.<br><br>This dynamic has played out in many ways for many years, and men have always been the default character and women have always been a specialized class. Women are a class of human that needs to be paired with a man in order to be effective. This has always been the case.

Comments (55) 1709 👁️