What did you mean by this statement, Kant?

The only thing that is good without qualification is a good will (Immanuel Kant). <br><br>Let's all just say it together, shall we? "Only a good will is good without qualification." I can't help but feel there must be more to the statement than its face value, which is an awfully silly-sounding thing at best. It must be qualified by the notion of how Kant defined his terms, which begs the question, how do *you* define your terms when you say, "Only a good will is good without qualification."