Realism vs. anti-realism: why should science prove philosophy?

Since my last post was not complete, I'm trying again.<br><br>This time I introduce myself. I am an old man in the world of philosophy, and I ask myself whether anyone can follow me into the depth of my thoughts.<br><br>I would like to discuss the topic of realism vs. anti-realism. My view is that we differ both in our conceptions of reality and in our attitudes towards truth. The problem is that we are all trying to prove each other wrong by grumbling in our little puddles, instead of working together to deepen the ocean that is the truth.<br><br>I would be interested in your thoughts.